Defining infringement
Software patenting is presented as a fait accompli
The main justifiation of some companies is the need to patent
corporate culture, international constraints
protecting heavy investment (e.g. airplane software, ABS)
Can be compensated by a restrictive definition of infringement so as not to freeze the software economy
avoid economic distortions in software economy
allow open source innovation
For Example: Use of a patented programming technique in a programmable commodity is not an infringement.
important words: "programmable" and "commodity"
means we stay in the economy of intangibles (avoid distortion)
innovation incentive weak in very large pool of potential innovators
Give precedence to interoperability over patents (public interest)
because of major role of network effects
because the value of interoperability standards comes from user pool rather than inventiveness
Bernard Lang
, INRIA - AFUL - ISOC France
^
Slide 12